time for a new list?
Eric Kozowski
eric at haydenisland.verio.net
Tue Nov 3 03:58:45 UTC 1998
At 07:01 PM 11/2/98 , Joe Shaw wrote:
>
>I think moderating the group might not be such a bad idea. The only
>problem with this would be getting someone who had enough time to actually
>moderate the list. I don't know what is going on lately, but it seems
>egos and animosity are running rampant on both inet-access and nanog. I
>have been caught up in it myself, and for that I apologize.
i didn't, and don't, propose a moderated list. i propose a list with some
sort of subscription requirement, at least for the ability post, that will
only allow nano's to post. i also propose that the list be stringently
policed. one warning re: content of your postings, then your ability to
post is revoked.
i'd like to see a list that lives up to the intent of the nanog list, but
w/o all the useless drivel and chatter. if i wanted that, i'd still be
subscribed to inet-access.
--
Eric Kozowski
eric at haydenisland.verio.net
Non carborundum illigitimi
More information about the NANOG
mailing list