The Great Exchange
Jay R. Ashworth
jra at scfn.thpl.lib.fl.us
Wed May 27 19:33:04 UTC 1998
On Wed, May 27, 1998 at 01:44:08PM -0400, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> > 1) More needs to be done to leverage locality of traffic
>
> In the long run, why are we assuming there will be locality of
> traffic?
>
> It is true that the old PSTN has locality of traffic, but it doesn't
> have flat rate pricing, or the usage patterns that the Internet has. I
> argue that users are rarely more likely to be trying to download a web
> page from near to their homes than from far away. If there is
> locality, it is probably weak, and in the long run would only account
> for a fraction of the traffic.
The Web is Not The Net.
Please write that 100K times on your blackboard. (PS: no, you _can't_
use expect(1l) :-).
The fact, however, that you're correct in your implication that it's
difficult to prove how much traffic would be geographically local given
the routing technologies currently available is why I was going to slip
the peering in under the rug of selling the transit -- which everyone
seems to be telling me won't work.
On another point, it's worth noting that, _currently_, all the "good"
servers are somewhere else... but this won't be the case forever.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth jra at baylink.com
Member of the Technical Staff Unsolicited Commercial Emailers Sued
The Suncoast Freenet "Two words: Darth Doogie." -- Jason Colby,
Tampa Bay, Florida on alt.fan.heinlein +1 813 790 7592
Managing Editor, Top Of The Key sports e-zine ------------ http://www.totk.com
More information about the NANOG
mailing list