renumbering and roaming

Tue May 19 08:40:23 UTC 1998

On Mon, 18 May 1998, Daniel Reed wrote:
> ) Nah, good idea, but too many useful services with port numbers > 255, so

I think this seems nice, but gets complex, and as said breaks things, although
you could use the full range of a /16.

However, we'd really want TWO of everything, on different networks if possible
to give resilience, hence why I proposed
	x.y.z.2 -> resolver
	x.y.z-1.2 -> resolver

Paul
----
P Mansfield, Senior SysAdmin PSINet, +44-1223-577577x2611/577611 fax:577600 
*** If a grand piano had a rubout key, I'd be a concert pianist by now! ***