renumbering and roaming

Ben Buxton bb at zip.com.au
Mon May 18 12:22:31 UTC 1998


On Mon, May 18, 1998 at 10:59:16AM +0100, Paul Mansfield wrote:
> 
> On Sun, 17 May 1998, Michael Dillon turned on his computer and typed:
> > On Sun, 17 May 1998, Michael K. Smith:
> > 
> > IMHO every dialup customer from every ISP in the world should use
> > 192.168.254.1 for their DNS address and this number should be hard coded
> > as the default in all client software. Then this problem would go away.
> 
> if all ISPs agreed to use these addresses... say
> 	- TWO resolvers, e.g. 192.168.254,1 and 192.168.253.1
> 	- two mail relays, e.g. 192.168.254.5 and 192.168.253.5
> 	- two news servers, e.g. ---254.9 and 253.9
> 	- two ntp time servers 
> 	- etc etc

Of course, if a customer has a LAN out the back of the same machine
they're connecting from, and it's using these addresses (which
they are entitled to use), then it'll cause immense headaches..

-- 
Ben Buxton___bb at zip.com.au_____    o    _          _--_|\   ZIP Internet P/L
Zip's Network Dude            /____|___|_)________/______\______________________
Carbon:   9270-4777                    | .        \_.--._*    Virtually
Silicon: 9273-7111, 9247-7288    Paper: 92475276        v     the best :)



More information about the NANOG mailing list