NANOG and the USG Ex-Parte Rules

Mon May 18 10:25:36 UTC 1998

NANOG is supposed to be for North American Network Operators - can't the
owner remove posting privileges for Hank (since he meets neither of the 
criteria)?

Take the IAHC-apologist crap elsewhere Hank.

--
-- 
Karl Denninger (karl at MCS.Net)| MCSNet - Serving Chicagoland and Wisconsin
http://www.mcs.net/          | T1's from $600 monthly / All Lines K56Flex/DOV
			     | NEW! Corporate ISDN Prices dropped by up to 50%!
Voice: [+1 312 803-MCS1 x219]| EXCLUSIVE NEW FEATURE ON ALL PERSONAL ACCOUNTS
Fax:   [+1 312 803-4929]     | *SPAMBLOCK* Technology now included at no cost

On Mon, May 18, 1998 at 08:19:27AM +0200, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
> At 02:04 PM 5/17/98 -0500, Jim Fleming wrote:
> 
> NANOG is supposed to be be a "controlled" list - can't the owner remove
> posting privs for Jim?   -Hank
> 
> >
> >NANOG is supported by Merit
> >	and Merit is supported by the NSF
> >		and the NSF is supported by the U.S. Government
> >			and the U.S. Government is supported by U.S. taxpayers...
> >
> >This makes NANOG conversations about Internet Governance
> >topics subject to the Ex-Parte rules of the U.S. Government.
> >
> >I will try to include the right CCs so that the NTIA's web site
> >can be up to date.
> >
> >http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/
> >
> >
> >-
> >Jim Fleming
> >Unir Corporation - http://www.unir.net
> >IPv8 - Designed for the Rest of the Human Race
> >AM Radio Stations ---> http://www.DOT.AM
> >
> >
> 