CiscoSecure NT vs CS UNIX

Eric Germann ekgermann at CCTEC.COM
Fri May 8 17:08:57 UTC 1998


Err, buy decent hardware and it will.

400,000 hits per day.  Six months with narry a hiccup.  PPro 200 with 128MB
RAM.

Also, if you're looking for a Radius solution to interface with a real
relational db, NT works out a LOT cheaper than Sybase or Oracle on Unix.

Eric


At 08:06 AM 5/8/98 -0400, jeyers at ialn.com wrote:
>Depends on the size of your network.  "Scaleability and stability" and
>NT rarely go together...
>
>Jerry
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From:	Martin, Christian [SMTP:CMartin at mercury.balink.com]
>> Sent:	Thursday, May 07, 1998 8:48 PM
>> To:	'nanog at merit.edu'
>> Subject:	CiscoSecure NT vs CS UNIX
>> 
>> All Ye NANOG readers,
>> 
>> Does anyone use CiscoSecure ACS for NT to control router access?  If
>> so,
>> has anyone used the UNIX one and done a comparison?  I need to
>> evaluate
>> these tools as a replacement for the TACACS+ daemon available from
>> Cisco.  Any info would be appreciated, particularly scalability and
>> stability.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Christian
> 



More information about the NANOG mailing list