PC Bozo's World bites again (CNN, too)
michael at memra.com
Thu May 28 04:40:25 UTC 1998
On Wed, 27 May 1998, Matthew Marlowe wrote:
> That said, I think CNN messed up their explanation rather
> than giving wrong advice.
I don't think so. They even said in their article that the technical
details are based upon this URL
and this guy says stuff like:
And, it turns out, depending on how your ISP and other routers
encountered on the Internet handle your TCP/IP requests, that a MaxMTU
setting of 576, often referred to as the "Internet Standard", will in
many cases avoid the fragmentation of packets of data and the slow
transfer speeds which result.
> Stevens in TCP/IP Illustrated Volume I, pointed out
> that lower mtu's on dialup lines could significantly
> improve latency for interactive traffic while having
> only a small efficiency loss for data intensive traffic.
Most people are changing the MTU to speed up web browsing which is data
intensive, not interactive. I think Karl's explanation of broken Windows
TCP/IP stacks is more likely the root cause of the problem.
But has anyone ever done a proper test of this with sniffers at both the
client end of the network and the webserver end of the network?
Michael Dillon - Internet & ISP Consulting
Memra Communications Inc. - E-mail: michael at memra.com
http://www.memra.com - *check out the new name & new website*
More information about the NANOG