Wrong /24 Announcement at UU.net / BGP IOS Bug ?
haug at seicom.net
Sat May 23 10:19:56 UTC 1998
> Hi Vinny!
> As i am thinking about this, i came to the idea that mostly uu.net applies filters
> to their downstreams
> e.g. there are not filtering by as - they filter by access-list
> what i presume is that they use a
hmmm... this could be a solution, but from what source does uunet
generate this filter-list ?
The Ripe-Database contains this route object:
notify: guardian at seicom.net
notify: guardian at germany.net
changed: wh at seicom.net 19980126
> access-list xyz permit 220.127.116.11 255.255.255.0
> instead of (the correct one):
> access-list xyz permit 18.104.22.168 255.255.0.0
> note the difference ?
yes sure... but the question is, why did uunet change their filters
within the last days without action from us or our customer ?
And the magic is, the rest of 22.214.171.124 (e.g 126.96.36.199) is seen
> It's probably time for them to call the uunet support to fix this.
great !, 2 Tickets are already open, and no response from uunet. A
company who is about to control 60% of the us-internet market can
manipulate a lot of things and make a lot of money!.
I would say at least 50% of the german internet isps are connected
to uunet in Frankfurt. With their wrong announcement, their customers
got germany traffic over a internation link and paid for this. Whom did
they pay ? right uunet.... i think this wasnt a wanted effect currently
but it shows what could happen and who gets money for these mistakes.
I dont care this /24 in the us, because from our view it makes no
difference, but for the german isps it made a big difference.
We corrected it by announcing this /24 at mae-ffm, inxs and de-cix but
it cant be right that we have to change our announcement because the
world-leading isp has wrong filters.
And calling uunet in Frankfurt leads into a 10-minute voice claiming
your call is important to us... bla bla bla...
i think we gonna sent all 30seconds a mail to help at uu.net :-) hopefully
their tracking systems beaks down and they are pleased to answer :-)
or should we announce 188.8.131.52/24 and route it to /dev/nul...
or should we dig a hole and put our uu.net problems there into ....
Winfried - frustrated
PS: even a mail from the german uu.net people (thanks to them!) is stil
Winfried Haug | seicom.NET & SCHWABEN.DE | Tel. +49 7121 9770- 0
Laiblinsplatz 12 | Internet+ISDN access & consulting | Fax. +49 7121 9770-19
72793 Pfullingen | Access in STGT + RT + TUE + BB + LB | Rack +49 7127 989-X
haug at schwaben.net| 150*ISDN (64kb/X.75) / 100 * K56flex | Rack +49 711 9675-X
haug at seicom.NET |SAP-OSS * FTP * TELNET * NETNEWS * IRC | Rack +49 7121 709-X
* 10 MBit DE-CIX * 2 MBit INXS * 5 MBit ecrc/ebone * 2 Mbit Belwue * 2 Mbit WIN
More information about the NANOG