Internic hosage

Fox Mulder madlion at justin.net
Thu Mar 19 00:02:50 UTC 1998


I'm still shocked that it took 4 days to motify my NIC Handle.  

Moe.

On Wed, 18 Mar 1998, Marc Hurst wrote:

> 
> Maybe NSI is just unhappy about how they were portrayed in the latest 
> Wired article....;)
> 
> On Wed, 18 Mar 1998, Jon Lewis wrote:
> 
> > Is anyone else having trouble recently with Internic garbling domain
> > templates and then sending them back as invalid?  Many of the lines come
> > back with more .'s than they were sent in with, and they seem to
> > consistently be doing variations on the following:
> > 
> > >Secondary Name Server(s)
> > >8a. Secondary Server Hostname.......:jabba.tlh.fdt.net
> > >8b. Secondary Server Netaddress.....:199.44...96.16
> > 
> > It didn't have the extra .'s in the IP address any of the 4 times we
> > submitted this particular domain registration.  Usually, it comes back
> > with one extra in the IP...this last one had a bonus of 2 extra.
> > 
> > I guess when they decided to lower the fee from $50 to $35, they decided
> > to break their automated system so they could justify raising it back to
> > $50 so they can hire more staff to unbreak things. :)
> > 
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> >  Jon Lewis <jlewis at fdt.net>  |  Unsolicited commercial e-mail will
> >  Network Administrator       |  be proof-read for $199/message.
> >  Florida Digital Turnpike    |  
> > ______http://inorganic5.fdt.net/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key____
> > 
> > 
> 




More information about the NANOG mailing list