Someones being naughty again...

Sun Mar 15 18:34:35 UTC 1998

The upstreams should certainly be filtering this.  I am truly surprised
someone is still leaking a ten/8 network to the world.

Alex

On Sat, 14 Mar 1998 jlixfeld at idirect.ca wrote:

> No, you should definetly not be able to ping it.  Where are you in
> respect to home.net?  If you are not directly connected to home.net and if
> you can ping that IP, then @home is trying to advertise 10.0.184.0 to
> their upstreams and they are accepting those advertisments.  If you are
> on home.net then you will be able to see them.  That is definetly wrong
> though!  I can see if you use 10.x net for un-advertised touch-down nets
> between two routers, but you should definetly not be able to ping them
> from afar.
> 
> On Sat, 14 Mar 1998, Marc Hurst wrote:
> 
> :Pinging ? [10.0.184.34] with 48 data bytes
> :Statistics for 10.0.184.34
> :12 packets transmitted, 6 packets received, 50% packet loss
> :round-trip (ms) min/avg/max = 117/123/141
> :
> :This is wrong....
> :
> :I should not be able to do this!
> :
> :M.
> :
> 
> --
> Regards,  
> 
> Jason A. Lixfeld             jlixfeld at idirect.ca
> System Administrator [L5]    jlixfeld at torontointernetxchange.net
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> TUCOWS Interactive Ltd. o/a  | "A Different Kind of Internet Company"
> Internet Direct Canada Inc.  | "FREE BANDWIDTH for Toronto Area IAPs"
> 5415 Dundas Street West      | http://www.torontointernetxchange.net
> Suite 301, Toronto Ontario   | (416) 236-5806 ext 18 (T)
> M9B-1B5 CANADA               | (416) 236-5804        (F)
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> 