More smurf networks. FIX YOUR ROUTERS.

John Fraizer John.Fraizer at EnterZone.Net
Sun Jun 7 20:37:59 UTC 1998


While you IRC people are out checking for SMURF amplifier networks, perhaps
you should check your own:

[root at eth0-core0]:~ # ping 132.249.66.0
PING 132.249.66.0 (132.249.66.0): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 132.249.66.6: icmp_seq=0 ttl=245 time=83.0 ms
64 bytes from 132.249.66.159: icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=84.3 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 132.249.66.148: icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=84.8 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 132.249.66.109: icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=85.3 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 132.249.30.7: icmp_seq=0 ttl=245 time=85.8 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 132.249.66.154: icmp_seq=0 ttl=53 time=86.3 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 132.249.66.62: icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=87.0 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 132.249.66.208: icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=87.4 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 132.249.66.140: icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=89.6 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 132.249.66.146: icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=90.1 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 132.249.66.45: icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=90.6 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 132.249.66.124: icmp_seq=0 ttl=53 time=91.1 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 132.249.66.229: icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=91.6 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 132.249.66.166: icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=92.1 ms (DUP!)

--- 132.249.66.0 ping statistics ---
1 packets transmitted, 1 packets received, +13 duplicates, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 83.0/87.7/92.1 ms
[root at eth0-core0]:~ # ping 132.249.66.255
PING 132.249.66.255 (132.249.66.255): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 132.249.66.159: icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=85.0 ms
64 bytes from 132.249.66.148: icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=86.1 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 132.249.66.109: icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=87.0 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 132.249.30.7: icmp_seq=0 ttl=245 time=87.5 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 132.249.66.154: icmp_seq=0 ttl=53 time=88.0 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 132.249.66.6: icmp_seq=0 ttl=245 time=88.5 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 132.249.66.62: icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=88.9 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 132.249.66.140: icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=89.5 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 132.249.66.146: icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=91.3 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 132.249.66.208: icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=91.8 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 132.249.66.45: icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=92.4 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 132.249.66.229: icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=92.9 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 132.249.66.124: icmp_seq=0 ttl=53 time=93.4 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 132.249.66.166: icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=93.9 ms (DUP!)

--- 132.249.66.255 ping statistics ---
1 packets transmitted, 1 packets received, +13 duplicates, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 85.0/89.7/93.9 ms




-------
John Fraizer    (root)          |    __   _                 |
The System Administrator        |   / /  (_)__  __ ____  __ | The choice
mailto:root at EnterZone.Net       |  / /__/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / |  of a GNU
http://www.EnterZone.Net/       | /____/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ | Generation
                     A 486 is a terrible thing to waste...




More information about the NANOG mailing list