different thinking on exchanging traffic
Jay R. Ashworth
jra at scfn.thpl.lib.fl.us
Mon Jun 1 18:24:41 UTC 1998
On Fri, May 29, 1998 at 11:31:27PM -0400, Steve Sobol wrote:
> > I wonder how much bandwidth at the MAEs could be saved if more areas
> > built local low-cost NAPs just for local traffice exchanges?
>
> I think there's a lot of merit to this proposal. When I first signed on with
> a local Internet provider, the owner explained to me that GEOGRAPHIC
> proximity does not always equal INTERNET proximity. Back then (1991-92)
> there was not a lot of infrastructure, so often that couldn't be helped. It's
> quite different now, though.
No it's not.
There's still little confluence between the two distance metrics. :-)
You're correct in noting that the infrastructure will support it now,
though.
Gotta go find me a vulture capitalist...
Cheers,
- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth jra at baylink.com
Member of the Technical Staff Unsolicited Commercial Emailers Sued
The Suncoast Freenet "Two words: Darth Doogie." -- Jason Colby,
Tampa Bay, Florida on alt.fan.heinlein +1 813 790 7592
Managing Editor, Top Of The Key sports e-zine ------------ http://www.totk.com
More information about the NANOG
mailing list