Why does Sprint have address filters again?
Patrick W. Gilmore
patrick at priori.net
Mon Jun 1 09:16:31 UTC 1998
At 12:52 PM 5/31/98 -0700, Roeland M.J. Meyer wrote:
>There is a definite business case for portable /21's. First off, I
>understand the technical need to limit ASN's to /19's so I don't need
>lecture #101. However, those limits were set quite some time ago. When can
>we reduce them? Has technology stood still?
You understand "the technical need to limit ASN's to /19's"? I don't,
perhaps you could explain it to me. I have a whole bunch of multi-homed
downstreams who have /21s or /20s - with their own ASNs. Should we just
give them more space? Or are they "not allowed" to multi-home? What am I
missing?
>Roeland M.J. Meyer, ISOC (InterNIC RM993)
TTFN,
patrick
**************************************************************
Patrick W. Gilmore voice: +1-650-482-2840
Director of Operations, CCIE #2983 fax: +1-650-482-2844
PRIORI NETWORKS, INC. http://www.priori.net
"Tomorrow's Performance.... Today"
**************************************************************
More information about the NANOG
mailing list