woo hoo!

Phil Howard phil at charon.milepost.com
Tue Feb 10 21:35:52 UTC 1998


Tim Salo writes...

> > From: Alex Rubenstein <alex at nac.net>
> > 
> > What are the facts? 
> 
> Who cares?
> 
> Or, perhaps more precisely, whose business is it anyway?

I agree.  There could be any number of reasons someone leaves in a few
weeks.  Unfortunately, the traditional interview process is not all that
good in making a judgement on the match.  In most of them, judging the
employee candidate seems to take precendent over judging the organization.
In the best interviews I've been to, I get to meet one or two levels up
from my potential manager, and most or all my peers.  I get a chance to
judge them as well as they get a chance to judge me to see if we can make
a team.  Such an interview takes all day.  Unfortunately most companies
are so swamped with candidates bearing inflated resumes that they have to
interview dozens of potential candidates and good interviewing just does
not take place.  And just because one individual doesn't like the place
doesn't mean there is anything wrong with it.  And employers make mistakes
about employees, too, at times.  It is an imperfect process and its failure
should not be used to judge either side.


> These mail lists are hardly the appropriate place to discuss the
> personnel matters of any organization.

Agreed.

-- 
Phil Howard | stop5it9 at no1where.com stop4it6 at no52ads5.com suck4it8 at no0place.org
  phil      | eat1this at noplace0.net eat30me6 at s5p8a1m5.com no9spam4 at anywhere.net
    at      | suck5it7 at anyplace.edu w4x3y3z8 at spam0mer.net no7way17 at dumbads2.com
  milepost  | suck7it7 at s1p9a7m0.org stop1it1 at noplace8.com eat1this at lame3ads.net
    dot     | ads5suck at nowhere5.net ads0suck at s1p7a8m7.org w8x4y3z3 at anywhere.edu
  com       | stop7it1 at s3p9a5m5.com eat72me5 at no1where.org ads0suck at anyplace.org



More information about the NANOG mailing list