MTU of the Internet?
Jay R. Ashworth
jra at scfn.thpl.lib.fl.us
Tue Feb 10 00:15:37 UTC 1998
On Mon, Feb 09, 1998 at 10:24:52AM -0500, Frank Kastenholz wrote:
> At 12:36 AM 2/8/98 -0600, Phil Howard wrote:
> >By loading the images in parallel, with the initial part of the image files
> >being a fuzzy approximation, you get to see about where every button is
> >located, and in many cases you know exactly what it is, and you can click
> >on them as soon as you know where to go.
>
> things like buttons tend to be very very small.
> the connections never really get out of slowstart.
> loading them all in parallel would help, somewhat,
> to fully utilize the b*d of the path. but it isn't
> very adaptive. better would be to use a single connection
> to load all the images. the tcp will rather quickly settle
> on the 'best' bandwidth of the link and your overall
> throughput will then be optimal.
But, as has been noted, loading things in parallel is a user interface
issue (I'm tempted to substitute the word requirement, there... :-)
Can we move this over to NODlist at nodewarrior.net, folks, before we piss
off Randy, John, and Paul?
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth jra at baylink.com
Member of the Technical Staff Unsolicited Commercial Emailers Sued
The Suncoast Freenet "Two words: Darth Doogie." -- Jason Colby,
Tampa Bay, Florida on alt.fan.heinlein +1 813 790 7592
Managing Editor, Top Of The Key sports e-zine ------------ http://www.totk.com
More information about the NANOG
mailing list