MTU of the Internet?
Phil Howard
phil at charon.milepost.com
Sun Feb 8 05:40:43 UTC 1998
Paul A Vixie writes...
> the whole idea of opening multiple tcp sessions "to get better performance"
> is just horrible in any case. http/1.1 can do serial multiplexing when
> talking to a particular server, and browsers have now got no excuse at all
> for opening more than one connection unless it's to more than one server.
I'm aware of the existance of a protocol for HTTP to persistent connections
where one object/document can be downloaded, and after that is done, another
can be requested and downloaded, and again as needed. But I know not of any
protocol for multiplexing so that I can have concurrency of the transfers of
multiple images at the same time. Is there an RFC for this or is it some
other kind of document?
--
Phil Howard | a4b7c9d8 at dumb4ads.edu w5x2y1z8 at dumb7ads.net ads6suck at anywhere.org
phil | stop9738 at anyplace.org w2x1y8z3 at anyplace.org no12ads2 at no6place.net
at | suck1it1 at anyplace.net end5ads8 at dumb0ads.org blow6me7 at anywhere.edu
milepost | stop1939 at no0place.edu no7spam8 at nowhere9.net crash622 at lame2ads.edu
dot | no2spam0 at nowhere3.com ads9suck at spam1mer.org eat51me4 at dumbads4.edu
com | eat38me6 at nowhere7.com end8ads2 at dumb8ads.edu end2ads7 at spam1mer.net
More information about the NANOG
mailing list