MAE-Central
Jeremy Porter
jerry at fc.net
Tue Feb 3 16:01:22 UTC 1998
In message <199802030422.XAA06212 at merit.edu>, "Kent W. England" writes:
>At 09:28 AM 2/2/98 , Phil Howard wrote:
>>>
>>> http://www.nwfusion.com/news/0128mae.html
>>
>>How about your password to access this? Or were you quoting the entire
>>article? Where will this MAE-Central be located?
>>
>
>Sorry, but I can't find a Worldcom press release anywhere. I don't feel
>right cutting and pasting the entire article, but the location is slated to
>be Dallas.
>
>(BTW, isn't it scandalous that MFS would copy the PacBell NAP and build a
>MAE using S'com BPX switches? I went back and checked the nanog archives
>and compiled a list of all the ISPs that swore they would never connect to
>an ATM NAP. How many are planning to disconnect from the MAEs when the ATM
>switches come up?)
>
>--Kent
Its particuarlly bad that MFS starts this when they already have a
MAE-Dallas based on their standard cisco platforms. The local
ISPs put together an alternative interconnect to reduce costs
and MFS comes out with this shit. I know one company that
isn't going to be doing any new business with MFS/Worldcom.
---
Jeremy Porter, Freeside Communications, Inc. jerry at fc.net
PO BOX 80315 Austin, Tx 78708 | 1-800-968-8750 | 512-458-9810
http://www.fc.net
More information about the NANOG
mailing list