Lawsuit threat against RBL users

Stephen Stuart stuart at tech.org
Fri Dec 4 17:45:50 UTC 1998


> Hasn't the operational value of this discussion been exhausted?

Yes; in fact, a separate list was created to handle it:

> Message-ID: <19981120161543.A21268 at puck.nether.net>
> Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1998 16:15:43 -0500
> From: Jared Mauch <jared at puck.nether.net>
> To: nanog at merit.edu
> Subject: rbl-discuss at puck.nether.net
> Reply-To: rbl-discuss at puck.nether.net
> 
> 
>       new mailing list out there.
> 
>       rbl-discuss at puck.nether.net
> 
>       for discussion of rbl type filtering, consequences, etc.
> 
>       to get on:
> 
>       send mail to rbl-discuss-request at puck.nether.net
> 
>       subject: subscribe
> 
>       to get off:
> 
>       (insert pun here)
> 
>         send mail to rbl-discuss-request at puck.nether.net
> 
>         subject: unsubscribe
> 
> -- 
> Jared Mauch  | pgp key available via finger from
> jared at puck.nether.net
> clue++;      | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/

Will everyone who wants to keep the RBL discussion alive *please* go
there?

Stephen



More information about the NANOG mailing list