Generation of traffic in "settled" peering arrangement
jcurran at bbnplanet.com
Tue Aug 25 03:56:50 UTC 1998
At 04:14 PM 08/24/1998 -0700, Patrick Greenwell wrote:
>The net effect is that the transit provider is double-dipping,
>and it costs the receiver twice to receive the data.
>Somehow this doesn't seem to be very attractive to me.
You're paying half the cost currently, the sender (presuming
they're transit or a relatively balanced peer) is paying the
More information about the NANOG