Generation of traffic in "settled" peering arrangement

John Curran jcurran at
Tue Aug 25 03:56:50 UTC 1998

At 04:14 PM 08/24/1998 -0700, Patrick Greenwell wrote:

>The net effect is that the transit provider is double-dipping, 
>and it costs the receiver twice to receive the data. 
>Somehow this doesn't seem to be very attractive to me. 

You're paying half the cost currently, the sender (presuming
they're transit or a relatively balanced peer) is paying the 
other half.


More information about the NANOG mailing list