SMURF amplifier block list
Jay R. Ashworth
jra at scfn.thpl.lib.fl.us
Tue Apr 14 19:36:45 UTC 1998
On Tue, Apr 14, 1998 at 08:49:04AM -0700, Aaron Beck wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Apr 1998, Stephen Sprunk wrote:
> > Then again, filtering any packets to or from x.x.x.255 would have a
> > similar but more profound effect. Anyone who actually uses a .255
> > address for a host is asking for trouble anyways.
> the problem with that thinking, of course, is going to crop up when you
> encounter /23's and greater.
No, IMHO, the comment stands: no matter _what_ size your network is, if
you assign host addresses with a .0 or .255 final octet, things may
break, and you deserve what you get.
Jay R. Ashworth jra at baylink.com
Member of the Technical Staff Unsolicited Commercial Emailers Sued
The Suncoast Freenet "Two words: Darth Doogie." -- Jason Colby,
Tampa Bay, Florida on alt.fan.heinlein +1 813 790 7592
Managing Editor, Top Of The Key sports e-zine ------------ http://www.totk.com
More information about the NANOG