SMURF amplifier block list
karl at mcs.net
Tue Apr 14 16:15:03 UTC 1998
On Tue, Apr 14, 1998 at 08:49:04AM -0700, Aaron Beck wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Apr 1998, Stephen Sprunk wrote:
> > Then again, filtering any packets to or from x.x.x.255 would have a
> > similar but more profound effect. Anyone who actually uses a .255
> > address for a host is asking for trouble anyways.
> the problem with that thinking, of course, is going to crop up when you
> encounter /23's and greater.
> -- Aaron
Not often. Few people are actually supernetting within a given broadcast
domain. There's still an awful lot of hardware that doesn't work right in
The larger problem is that subnetted /24s still are wide open. This kind of
filter won't block anything from their broadcast addresses, since they're
not the .255 address.
Karl Denninger (karl at MCS.Net)| MCSNet - Serving Chicagoland and Wisconsin
http://www.mcs.net/ | T1's from $600 monthly / All Lines K56Flex/DOV
| NEW! Corporate ISDN Prices dropped by up to 50%!
Voice: [+1 312 803-MCS1 x219]| EXCLUSIVE NEW FEATURE ON ALL PERSONAL ACCOUNTS
Fax: [+1 312 803-4929] | *SPAMBLOCK* Technology now included at no cost
More information about the NANOG