jhawk at bbnplanet.com
Mon Apr 13 20:30:40 UTC 1998
> Not too sure if this falls into NANOG or not but I thought I'd give it a
No, it does not.
Please report it to your network service provider (in this case,
<ops at bbnplanet.com>).
NANOG is not for reports of problems by end-users to service providers.
Expressly *NOT* *NOT* *NOT* for that.
> Pinging 126.96.36.199 from San Francisco CA (GTE & Pacbell) and our
> colo in Bay City MI (MCI), I get a standard response. However, if I
> ping from our colo in Cambridge MA (GTE), I get a response of "2 times
> amplification" instead of packet loss.
More information about the NANOG