oh, for goodness' sake.

Wed Apr 8 19:07:43 UTC 1998

At 07:41 AM 4/8/98 +0800, David R. Conrad wrote:
>>I think that placing such critical domain references under .INT is a
>>reasonable idea.
>
>I suspect this could be controversial given .INT is supposed to be
>administered by the ITU... :-)
>
>Since we're already saddled with .arpa and it is already used for
>(arguably) critical infrastructure goop, why not use it?

I wasn't trying to argue in favor of .INT, merely in favor of a rigorous
definition of who gets one of these ops-related registrations and who doesn't.

d/
________________________________________________________________________
Dave Crocker                Brandenburg Consulting       +1 408 246 8253
dcrocker at brandenburg.com      675 Spruce Drive       (f) +1 408 249 6205
www.brandenburg.com        Sunnyvale, CA 94086  USA