NANOG-PHYSICS (was Re: ATM (was Re: too many routes))
John A. Tamplin
jat at traveller.com
Mon Sep 15 21:14:00 UTC 1997
Did I make a mistake and signup for nanog-physics instead of nanog? While
we are at it, why don't we just come up with wave equations for the
entire Internet?
On Mon, 15 Sep 1997, Mark Kent wrote:
> Those of you who want the Internet described in terms of elementary
> particles might also be interested in a bit of detail left off
> by Rob Barron:
>
> A ping pong ball is 37.2mm to 38.2mm in diameter and
> weighs 2.40 to 2.53 grams.
>
> So a 40mm inside diameter seems to be called for.
>
> -mark
>
John Tamplin Traveller Information Services
jat at Traveller.COM 2104 West Ferry Way
205/883-4233x7007 Huntsville, AL 35801
More information about the NANOG
mailing list