NANOG-PHYSICS (was Re: ATM (was Re: too many routes))

John A. Tamplin jat at
Mon Sep 15 21:14:00 UTC 1997

Did I make a mistake and signup for nanog-physics instead of nanog?  While
we are at it, why don't we just come up with wave equations for the 
entire Internet?

On Mon, 15 Sep 1997, Mark Kent wrote:

> Those of you who want the Internet described in terms of elementary
> particles might also be interested in a bit of detail left off
> by Rob Barron:
>   A ping pong ball is 37.2mm to 38.2mm in diameter and 
>   weighs 2.40 to 2.53 grams.
> So a 40mm inside diameter seems to be called for.
> -mark

John Tamplin					Traveller Information Services
jat at Traveller.COM				2104 West Ferry Way
205/883-4233x7007				Huntsville, AL 35801

More information about the NANOG mailing list