not rewriting next-hop, pointing default, ...
randy at psg.com
Thu Sep 11 22:54:00 UTC 1997
> LSR is actually a significant security issue. So, while I do
> understand and am sympathetic to the operational debugging
> issues that LSR addresses, I think that requiring a peer to
> enable LSR more than 2 hops inside their network from the
> outside world is unreasonable.
So, you're comfortable with asking for LSR at the IX and a hop behind?
> In a world where SSH were available in cisco routers and/or
> IPsec were more widely deployed, I might have different views.
K5 does not give you sufficient warm fuzzies?
More information about the NANOG