Tracking SPAM (Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful)
phil at agis.net
Wed Oct 29 23:00:15 UTC 1997
At 10:29 AM 10/29/97 -0800, Mark Milhollan wrote:
>Phil Lawlor writes:
>>Back to sender verification (equivalent of caller ID).
>>This would allow better reporting of AUP violations to the sending domain
>>from the receiving domain. Logs could be used to document the violation.
>As I said in a previous [private] message, I would be very interested
>in reading about your solution.
AGIS is kicking this, along with other ideas around. We spent a great deal
of resources on the IEMMC thing, and that didn't work out well. Thought
I'd toss the caller ID idea out to get feedback from this list.
Voice - 313-730-1130
Fax - 313-563-6119
More information about the NANOG