Tracking SPAM (Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful)

Phil Lawlor phil at
Wed Oct 29 23:00:15 UTC 1997

At 10:29 AM 10/29/97 -0800, Mark Milhollan wrote:
>Phil Lawlor writes:
>>Back to sender verification (equivalent of caller ID).
>>This would allow better reporting of AUP violations to the sending domain
>>from the receiving domain.  Logs could be used to document the violation. 
>As I said in a previous [private] message, I would be very interested
>in reading about your solution.

AGIS is kicking this, along with other ideas around.  We spent a great deal
of resources on the IEMMC thing, and that didn't work out well.  Thought
I'd toss the caller ID idea out to get feedback from this list.

Phil Lawlor
Voice - 313-730-1130
Fax   - 313-563-6119

More information about the NANOG mailing list