NAP Architecture

Vijay Gill wrath at
Fri Oct 24 14:12:07 UTC 1997

On Fri, 24 Oct 1997, Neil J. McRae wrote:

> True, but surely there are basics that you would already
> have researched, btw has some very intersting
> things on ATM NAP.

Already checked into that.  Never hurts to get a wide spectrum of
responses.  For example, someone pointed out 3com switches, something that
had never even crossed my cisco centric thought process.

Reasons for asking also include the future path of a relatively untested
box (GSR) vs a known factor (GIGAswitch).


More information about the NANOG mailing list