why not peer with LS disabling networks ?

• Previous message (by thread): why not peer with LS disabling networks ?
• Next message (by thread): why not peer with LS disabling networks ?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

At 04:38 PM 11/23/97 +0000, Lyndon Levesley wrote:

> I'm curious - is this a firm "NO" thing, or do you peer with people
>that offer alternatives ? We disable LSR a/x our whole net but still
>provide a traceroute server and (RSN) a looking glass. What other
>reasons do you want LSR enabled for ?
>

traceroute -g can be a surprisingly useful tool.

- paul

• Previous message (by thread): why not peer with LS disabling networks ?
• Next message (by thread): why not peer with LS disabling networks ?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]