Geographic v. topological address allocation [Was: Re: IPv8 < IPv6]
Paul Ferguson
ferguson at cisco.com
Thu Nov 6 22:10:37 UTC 1997
Alan,
Thinking about your response, I am reminded of the
MUST and SHOULD semantics in the context of IETF
documents. ;-)
- paul
At 05:03 PM 11/6/97 -0500, Alan Hannan wrote:
>
> Networks that span large geographic areas should be deaggregated
> into regional ares such that aggregation can be efficiently
> implemented.
>
> Additionally, within this provider, they should allocate their
> chunk of the address space in a geographic manner.
>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list