Geographic v. topological address allocation [Was: Re: IPv8 < IPv6]

Paul Ferguson ferguson at cisco.com
Thu Nov 6 22:10:37 UTC 1997


Alan,

Thinking about your response, I am reminded of the
MUST and SHOULD semantics in the context of IETF
documents.  ;-)

- paul

At 05:03 PM 11/6/97 -0500, Alan Hannan wrote:

>
>  Networks that span large geographic areas should be deaggregated
>  into regional ares such that aggregation can be efficiently
>  implemented.
>
>  Additionally, within this provider, they should allocate their
>  chunk of the address space in a geographic manner.
>




More information about the NANOG mailing list