NAT etc. (was: Spam Control Considered Harmful)

Paul A Vixie paul at vix.com
Sun Nov 2 20:26:10 UTC 1997


> Yup, it could, but as I noted to Paul, in the cases Sean is advocating,
> the client and the NAT box may not be within the same span of
> administration, either.  IE: no, you may _not_ trust the NAT op.

And as I noted in my reply, the real opportunities for NAT are when one
side of the NAT trusts the NAT and the other side considers it "just 
another public client".



More information about the NANOG mailing list