Spam Control Considered Harmful
NetSurfer
netsurf at pixi.com
Sat Nov 1 02:04:59 UTC 1997
On Thu, 30 Oct 1997, Matt Ryan wrote:
> If people are having trouble with their mailservers dying under the spammers
> attack(!) then I would suggest they need a more scalable system.
If the spammers argue that they have a right to send a machine 4000+
messages then why is it mail bombing when someone retaliates and sends the
spammer 4000+ messages? Do the spammers need a more scalable system?
-
James D. Wilson
netsurf at pixi.com
More information about the NANOG
mailing list