MCI Accepts Worldcom's Bid? ; charset=us-ascii
steve at lynx.genuity.net
Mon Nov 10 20:56:04 UTC 1997
> On Mon, 10 Nov 1997, Karl Denninger wrote:
> > Frankly, this could be a *good* thing for the industry. Among other things
> > large organizations have a habit and history of being unable to perceive
> > and act on market-based changes quickly enough to capitalize on them.
> > They tend to act like 900lb Gorillas instead, which is great if you're into
> > slow, plodding things, and not so good if you aren't fast enough to get
> > stepped on. But eventually, stepping on people draws the fire of people
> > on the DOJ side of the fence.
> I agree, I think this is a good thing for many NSPs. It is going to be a
> HUGE job to combine UUNET, ANS, and Internet MCI. They have huge hardware
> differences. ANS with the new BAY BCN hardware that they spent a large
> time developing, MCI with their large Stratacom network, and UUNet with
> their new Fore network. They all connect customers in a different way, it
> will take some time to bring all of that together. There will be major
> outages and problems associated with this merger. It will be a big change
> for other backbone providers to come in a take some of their customers
> base. It also will be easier to watch 1 big gorilla then 3 smaller ones.
Pessimist Nathan? I seems to me that it would be out of character for
Worldcom to integrate MCI. They didn't with MFS, ANS or UUNet. Different
More information about the NANOG