uDNS Root Name Servers Taking Shape - on a couple ISDN lines
Paul Ferguson
pferguso at cisco.com
Fri May 30 12:51:42 UTC 1997
I would really appreciate it, as I'm sure may other subscribers
of the NANOG would, if you DNS combatants would take this discussion
elsewhere, to a more appropriate list. I'm on the verge of constructing
filters so that I don't have to see this cruft -- short of that, I'm
now considering unsubscribing to the list.
The signal/noise ratio has degenerated dramatically.
Please remove nanog at merit.edu from the CC: line.
- paul
At 08:42 AM 05/30/97 -0400, Richard Shu wrote:
>
>Because we're not used to being members of organizations in which
>major decisions are driven by short-notice ultimatums.
>
>Because we had to act quickly when it became apparent that the
>root servers were likely to be arbitrarily reloaded with a set of
>TLDs less than the full set originally registered as eDNS TLDs.
>
>Because we are used to organizations that provide stability and
>reliability as key elements to foster an environment hospitable
>to business.
>
>Respectfully submitted,
>Richard Shu
>
>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list