Murkowski anti-spam bill could be a problem for ISPs
Phil Howard
phil at charon.milepost.com
Mon May 26 07:21:33 UTC 1997
Stephen Sprunk writes...
> I think that the burden should be placed entirely on the spammer; there is
> no reason to bother the user or the ISP with this mess.
>
> The current US law (USC Title 47 Sec 227) governing commercial
> telecommunications should be strengthened to explicitly include email.
Then all the spammers just migrate across the border. I already get spam
from Canada and Europe.
> Out of curiosity, has anyone considered the effect of this law (or others)
> on non-profit spam?
Or has anyone considered the effect of this law on spammers outside of the
United States?
--
Phil Howard KA9WGN +-------------------------------------------------------+
Linux Consultant | Linux installation, configuration, administration, |
Milepost Services | monitoring, maintenance, and diagnostic services. |
phil at milepost.com +-------------------------------------------------------+
More information about the NANOG
mailing list