UUNET Pulling Peering Agreements & replacing them with charging under non-disclosure?
Larry_Vaden at texoma.net
Larry_Vaden at texoma.net
Sat May 3 02:03:52 UTC 1997
At 10:42 AM 5/2/97 -0500, Karl Denninger wrote:
>
>Trying to extort money to peer is exactly that - extortion.
>
>Karl Denninger (karl at MCS.Net)| MCSNet - The Finest Internet Connectivity
I asked our telecommunications attorney, who bats 1000 in such matters,
about the issues involved. His reply:
>The action is probably anticompetitive. The problem is that the anti-trust
>laws are so hard, costly and time-consuming to enforce in civil matters,
>and for criminal you must get the state or federal authorities interested.
>
>To obtain relief you have to show intent and ability to monopolize. This
>is not a price squeeze -- to the contrary. You have to show concerted
>action. Market power. Damages.
>
>Notwithstanding my statement above about the authorities, I'd recommend all
>who are concerned go to the justice department and seek an investigation.
>That or even the threat often mitigates behavior.
Larry Vaden, founder and CEO help-desk 903-813-4500
Internet Texoma, Inc. <http://www.texoma.net> direct line 903-870-0365
bringing the real Internet to rural Texomaland fax 903-868-8551
Member of TISPA and ISP/C pager 903-867-6571
More information about the NANOG
mailing list