consistent policy != consistent announcements

Henry Kilmer hank at
Thu Mar 13 19:42:43 UTC 1997

Vince Fuller writes:
>I can see why you present inconsistant routes to us but I'm not sure that I
>understand why you'd prefer a customer prefix via a direct connection to them
>at one point in your network but via a connection to another provider at a
>different point in your network. That would seem internally inconsistant to
>me. Is this deliberate behavior to do shortest-exit within your network toward
>your customer?

We have some customers that have specifically requested this sort of arrangement.


More information about the NANOG mailing list