consistent policy != consistent announcements
Henry Kilmer
hank at rem.com
Thu Mar 13 19:42:43 UTC 1997
Vince Fuller writes:
>I can see why you present inconsistant routes to us but I'm not sure that I
>understand why you'd prefer a customer prefix via a direct connection to them
>at one point in your network but via a connection to another provider at a
>different point in your network. That would seem internally inconsistant to
>me. Is this deliberate behavior to do shortest-exit within your network toward
>your customer?
We have some customers that have specifically requested this sort of arrangement.
-Hank
More information about the NANOG
mailing list