consistent policy != consistent announcements
tonyb at uunet.pipex.com
Thu Mar 13 11:23:55 UTC 1997
Vadim Antonov wrote:
>2) generally speaking, BGP path length is too blunt an instrument. More fine-grained
>control is needed to allow peers to fine-tune balance of their interests. I'm
>sorry to be too naive, but i'm repeating that for years and nobody seems to agree
>that BGP needs real metrics. How come?
On this point does anyone have any experience of using the cisco DPA implementation
between providers ?
More information about the NANOG