consistent policy != consistent announcements

Tony Barber tonyb at
Thu Mar 13 11:23:55 UTC 1997

Vadim Antonov wrote:
>2) generally speaking, BGP path length is too blunt an instrument.  More fine-grained
>control is needed to allow peers to fine-tune balance of their interests.  I'm
>sorry to be too naive, but i'm repeating that for years and nobody seems to agree
>that BGP needs real metrics.  How come?

On this point does anyone have any experience of using the cisco DPA implementation
between providers ?


More information about the NANOG mailing list