Keynote/Boardwatch Internet Backbone Index A better te
jack.rickard at boardwatch.com
Fri Jun 27 22:24:48 UTC 1997
I probably don't agree that it is not a reliable way to draw conclusions
about backbone performance. The index has drawn criticism because it
points up winners and losers and that's about it. There is no way to do
this without criticism, and indeed it should be part of the process.
The end user experience will reflect the sum of that, plus dialup variables
which we simply do not include in this work.
> From: Mark Borchers <markb at infi.net>
> To: Jack Rickard <jack.rickard at boardwatch.com>
> Cc: nanog at merit.edu
> Subject: Re: Keynote/Boardwatch Internet Backbone Index A better te
> Date: Friday, June 27, 1997 6:09 AM
> I think you've stated for yourself the reason that this Index has
> drawn some criticism.
> By it's name it purports to be an index of backbone speed or backbone
> congestion or a combination of the above.
> Not only is it not really an index of these items, it could further
> be argued that there's not even any reliable way to draw conclusions
> about backbone performance from the Keynote measurements. As you
> say, there are many other variables. So why not give this thing a
> name that reflects it's real identity as an end-to-end test from the
> Keynote Perspective Agent locations to various WWW servers.
> > This assumes that you consider web server location and web server
> > performance to NOT be a part of overall network performance. Our view
> > steps back a bit from that. The majority of traffic would appear to be
> > webcentric. From an end users perspective, what does a web site on a
> > specific network look like and how does that compare to a web site on
> > another network? There are ENDLESS variables contributing to that
> > including intercity links, hub architecture, host hardware, host
> > peering, connectivity points with other networks, transit agreements,
> > of routers, ATM switching (or not). All contribute. We think most
> > notice Internet performance (or lack thereof) while viewing world wide
> > pages.
More information about the NANOG