[nsp] known networks for broadcast ping attacks
root at gannett.com
root at gannett.com
Wed Jul 30 21:35:23 UTC 1997
On Wed, 30 Jul 1997, Systems Engineer wrote:
> Well ever since this but was introduced to the outside world, I have
> since modified my present Firewall (ipfwadm v2.3.0) to accomodate.
>
> type prot source destination ports
> deny icmp 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.255 any
> deny icmp 0.0.0.255 0.0.0.0 any
>
My rule is:
deny icmp 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 any
With perhaps specific permits above that for devices that I find have
a legitimate need for ICMP (be it unreachables, or echo/echo reply).
I was wondering more if there were a good reason, other than for dial-up
users who may need connectivity checks, to allow any ICMP in, or ICMP to
say anything more than a terminal server's address range and certain hosts.
Hence my prior discussion on ping-mapping netblocks, and its lack of
applicability to the number of hosts on my network.
Paul
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul D. Robertson
gatekeeper at gannett.com
More information about the NANOG
mailing list