Non-ISP companies multi-homing?
root at gannett.com
root at gannett.com
Fri Jul 25 18:12:38 UTC 1997
On Fri, 25 Jul 1997, Eric Germann wrote:
> negates the whole purpose of multihoming from their perspective. Does
> Gannett or Pointcast have >= 8K hosts exposed on their DMZ networks?
No, but we have around 8K devices using our legal address space. Just
because I don't currently expose my hosts doesn't mean I don't want the
option to be able to. When we registered, firewalls weren't the
up-and-coming thing, but then I've also got a /23 being routed via my AS.
Most of that comes from the fact that my addresses are pre-CIDR customer
registered ones. Once again, it's back to the whole aggragation of
routes vs. disaggragation of traffic.
There, now that I've used disaggragation in a sentence, I'll sit down and
shut up.
Paul
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul D. Robertson
gatekeeper at gannett.com
More information about the NANOG
mailing list