default routes on Ciscos

Jeremy Hall jhall at UU.NET
Mon Jul 14 21:54:32 UTC 1997


DAVE NORDLUND said:
> 
> > Date:          Fri, 11 Jul 1997 10:30:58 -0400 (EDT)
> > From:          Nick Lauriat <lauriat at panther.middlebury.edu>
> > Subject:       default routes on Ciscos
> > To:            nanog at merit.edu
> 
> > 
> > Hi there!
> > 
> > Just curious if anyone out there knows of a way to configure default
> > routes on a per interface basis on a Cisco.  So that different interfaces
> > had different default routes statically defined.
> 
> Policy routing will do that at GREAT cost in CPU time.
> > 
> > Any thoughts? 
> > 
> > Thanks!
> > 
> > Nick Lauriat
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> Dave Nordlund               d-nordlund at ukans.edu
> University of Kansas        913/864-0450
> Computing Services          FAX 913/864-0485
> Lawrence, KS  66045         KANREN
> 

yes, but there are several ways to do this that isn't as expensive in CPU.
You could set an access list that is on all your peers, you could set up
communities to prevent leaking the default to your network, you could use
some form of the aggregate command (not recommended)

There are lots of ways.

_J



More information about the NANOG mailing list