weird BGP cisco-ism? [problem resolved]
Matthew Kaufman
matthew at scruz.net
Fri Jul 11 14:48:34 UTC 1997
Original message <199707112126.RAA11467 at home.partan.com>
From: Andrew Partan <asp at partan.com>
Date: Jul 11, 17:26
Subject: Re: weird BGP cisco-ism? [problem resolved]
>
> > provider, and we have "summary-only" set in our BGP configuration. Every
>
> Try it w/o the summary-only stuff.
Didn't help at all.
>
> I don't use summary-only, or aggregate-address, or network XXX at
> all. I redis my connected & static routes into bgp and arrange
> for my global routes to make it beyond my AS. I also use pull up
> static routes to null0 for all of my blocks.
I redistribute in a similar way, and have the statics to null0 as well.
Still insisted on flapping at least twice every time it got the brief
hit on the /24 subnet coming from the outside world.
At this point what needs to happen is for this to be recreated in
a lab somewhere and some config changes tried... I can't blow away
my customers one more time just to play with it.
Some day we'll have routers that can tell you what they're doing, right?
-matthew
More information about the NANOG
mailing list