ATM vs. DS3
Vadim Antonov
avg at pluris.com
Thu Jul 10 09:38:49 UTC 1997
Karl Denninger <karl at Mcs.Net> wrote:
>My God, someone admits it?
>I've used 20% as the general ATM overhead now for almost two years, and have
>been poo-pooed by lots of people claiming that it wasn't anywhere near that
>bad.
Now, now, that was beaten to death at many lists including NANOG.
What have you been, hybernating?
The ATM overhead depends a lot on small things like if you use SNAP
or not, etc.
--vadim
More information about the NANOG
mailing list