ATM vs. DS3

Vadim Antonov avg at pluris.com
Thu Jul 10 09:38:49 UTC 1997


Karl Denninger  <karl at Mcs.Net> wrote:

>My God, someone admits it?

>I've used 20% as the general ATM overhead now for almost two years, and have
>been poo-pooed by lots of people claiming that it wasn't anywhere near that
>bad.

Now, now, that was beaten to death at many lists including NANOG.
What have you been, hybernating?

The ATM overhead depends a lot on small things like if you use SNAP
or not, etc.

--vadim



More information about the NANOG mailing list