peering charges?
Jun Wu (John)
jun at wolfox.gsl.net
Mon Jan 27 19:50:36 UTC 1997
===== Jeff Young previously wrote: ====
>
> if internetMCI decides that we should or should not peer with
> another network the decision is made purely on traffic flows.
> if coast to coast traffic moves over our network twice between
> ourselves and the peer, that's not a peer. if the peer has a
> number of nap connections and a ds3 ld packet network, that's a peer.
>
Definitely 100% agree. Now think further, a global network with local
peers all over the place... hmm... how much international bandwidth
that might cost?
> the practice that you refer to as 'unwise' keeps us from losing
> our shirts in an already-too-competitive marketplace.
Underware as well if you think globally.
Jun
--
Jun (John) Wu | Voice: (703)689-5325
Supervisor - Global IP Systems & Services | Fax: (703)478-7852
Global One Communications L.L.C. | Email: jun at gsl.net
Reston, VA 20196 | URL: http://wolfox.gsl.net/jun
More information about the NANOG
mailing list