withdrawal propagation (was E.E. Times?)
John W. Stewart III
jstewart at metro.isi.edu
Wed Jan 15 15:39:15 UTC 1997
> > CSCdi75464, integrated in 11.1(7)CA and 11.1(7.3) mainline.
> > This is an optimization, not a bug fix, although I'm sure skeptics would
> > subjectively argue otherwise.
> How can you claim that this isn't a bug?
if you think it's a bug, then a fix is available
if you think it's an optimization, then the new code is available
why are we still talking about this?
More information about the NANOG