withdrawal propagation (was E.E. Times?)

Wed Jan 15 11:23:38 UTC 1997

On Tue, 14 Jan 1997 15:32:03 -0500 
 "Justin W. Newton" <justin at erols.com> wrote:

> A BGP withdrawl for a route which is not in the routing table does not
> cause the router to update any routes and is hence not a routing update.
> I.e. removing a route that isn't there is not very processor intensive.

Thats irrelevent, what it is doing is _broken_ and it should be fixed and
implemented.

Neil.
--
Neil J. McRae. Alive and Kicking.       Domino: In the glow of the night.
neil at DOMINO.ORG        NetBSD/sparc: 100% SpF (Solaris protection Factor) 
  Free the daemon in your <A HREF="http://www.NetBSD.ORG/">computer!</A>