withdrawal propagation (was E.E. Times?)

Tue Jan 14 17:24:19 UTC 1997

you forgot:

0) Is this a bug, does it cause any problem whatsoever?

Jeff Young
young at mci.net

> From: "William Allen Simpson" <wsimpson at greendragon.com>
> Message-ID: <5605.wsimpson at greendragon.com>
> To: nanog at merit.edu
> Subject: Re: withdrawal propagation (was E.E. Times?)
> Sender: owner-nanog at merit.edu
> Content-Type: text
> Content-Length: 1074
> 
> OK, I've read the article, and it's not very good.  The author doesn't
> understand the terminology.
> 
> Never-the-less, this is supposed to be a cooperative operations group,
> and we should be doing some operations!
> 
> I've looked at the Cisco page, and a search on "BGP, withdrawals" does
> not find any mention of the bug fix release.  So, I have some pointed
> questions!
> 
>  1) What release fixes the problem?
> 
>  2) Is the release free?
> 
>  3) Where has Cisco announced the release?
> 
> 
> And, bringing the operations closer to home:
> 
>  4) Has Merit installed the release?
> 
>  5) Has CICnet installed the release?
> 
>  6) Has MCI installed the release?
> 
>  7) Have all the peers at Ameritech NAP installed the release?
> 
> Once that is done, Craig will be able to see the effect of the bug fix
> at one NAP, and compare with other NAPs during the same time frame.
> 
> Then, we will know if it was a Cisco problem....
> 
> WSimpson at UMich.edu
>     Key fingerprint =  17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26  DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
> BSimpson at MorningStar.com
>     Key fingerprint =  2E 07 23 03 C5 62 70 D3  59 B1 4F 5E 1D C2 C1 A2