avg at pluris.com
Sat Jan 4 22:22:05 UTC 1997
Randall Atkinson <rja at inet.org> wrote:
>There are varying opinions on whether IPv6 will turn out to be the
>OSI of the 90s. There are also varying opinions on whether it is desirable
>for IPv6 to fly or not. Some believe that for IPv6 to fly operationally, the
>"6+2+8" proposal needs to be adopted.
Let me put it this way -- IPv6 does not fix _any_ hard problems
(routing stability, etc). It is about as useful as IPv4 with a
"more address bits" option.
More information about the NANOG