Just got on this thing (perhaps very belatedly) - root server trouble?
Karl Denninger
karl at Mcs.Net
Tue Feb 18 22:04:49 UTC 1997
>
> What is your point? IMHO it's far better for NSI to accept the
> applications without working SOA. Otherwise you lock people into paying
> ISPs to hold domains for them. While that might give you business,
> it's not something that NSI should enforce, or should have to enforce.
The point is that the *NAMESERVERS* aren't even resolvable 30% of the time!
That is, out of the NS records, I can't resolve about 30% of the *NS*
records that are listed in the .COM zone!
All I'm doing right now is a query for the NS lines for "." on the
nameservers which are uniquely represented in the .COM zone. And, as of
right now, about 30% of those NS records don't go anywhere.
I haven't even started looked at the SOAs for the delegations yet....
--
--
Karl Denninger (karl at MCS.Net)| MCSNet - The Finest Internet Connectivity
http://www.mcs.net/~karl | T1's from $600 monthly to FULL DS-3 Service
| 99 Analog numbers, 77 ISDN, Web servers $75/mo
Voice: [+1 312 803-MCS1 x219]| Email to "info at mcs.net" WWW: http://www.mcs.net/
Fax: [+1 312 803-4929] | 2 FULL DS-3 Internet links; 400Mbps B/W Internal
More information about the NANOG
mailing list