RFC1918 conformance
Alex P. Rudnev
alex at Relcom.EU.net
Tue Feb 11 19:04:19 UTC 1997
Sorry, but while I was looking to this list, I just reminded interesting
issue. Why IANA did not reserved 223.255.0.0/16 or something simular; by
other words, I'd like to have short (256, 512, 1024) private address
space in the END of total address space for the normal IP (excluding D
class etc).
For example. I have a lot of CISCO routers with OSPF protocol. Thnis
crazy IOS use highest loopback interface address as router-ID address; I
use loopbacks to install load balancing etc. and I can't prevent
loopbacks from being equal on the different routers. That's why I hardly
need some IP addresses for 'Loopback 98' interface to use it as
router-ID; and this have to be higher than any user's addresses. I use
233.255.254.0/24 for this purposes, but it's not reserved address.
This is one, simple, example why it's nessesary to reserve some short
address space in the begin and in the end of total addresses.
On Tue, 11 Feb 1997, Tony Bates wrote:
>
> Andrew Partan <asp at partan.com> writes:
>
> * They sure look reserved to me:
> * note% whois RESERVED
> * IANA (RESERVED-1) RESERVED 0.0.
> * 0.0
> * IANA (RESERVED-3) RESERVED 128.0.
> * 0.0
> * IANA (RESERVED-4) RESERVED 191.255.
> * 0.0
> * IANA (RESERVED-5) RESERVED 223.255.25
> * 5.0
> * IANA (RESERVED-7) Reserved 64.0.0.0 - 95.0.
> * 0.0
> * IANA (RESERVED-8) Reserved 96.0.0.0 - 126.0.
> * 0.0
> *
> * Actually it looks like I should add the top 1/2 of the old A space as well.
> *
> This would be good as I report each week in my report possible bogus
> routes but no one seems to care to filter (or fix this). Today it says:
>
> *** Bogus 69.1.0.0/16 from AS1849
> *** Bogus 69.2.0.0/16 from AS1849
> *** Bogus 90.0.0.0 from AS4747
> *** Bogus 103.40.99.0/24 from AS3249
>
> --Tony
>
Aleksei Roudnev, Network Operations Center, Relcom, Moscow
(+7 095) 194-19-95 (Network Operations Center Hot Line),(+7 095) 239-10-10, N 13729 (pager)
(+7 095) 196-72-12 (Support), (+7 095) 194-33-28 (Fax)
More information about the NANOG
mailing list